Economist.com Economist.com ADVANCED SEARCH



Friday January 30th 2004 denotes premium content | Log in | Free registration | Help

OPINION
WORLD
BUSINESS
FINANCE
SCIENCE
PEOPLE
BOOKS & ARTS
MARKETS
DIVERSIONS
Cities and Countries

EIU online store


Articles by subject
Backgrounders
Surveys
Economics A-Z
Style guide
Business
  encyclopedia



Management
Reading

Business Education
Executive Dialogue




Full contents
Past issues



Free registration
Web subscriptions
Print subscriptions
Academic offers
Gift vouchers
Mobile editions
E-mail alerts




Books, diaries and more



Classifieds
Business education, recruitment, business and personal: click here



The Economist Group
The Economist Intelligence Unit

Economist Conferences

The World In 2004

CFO

Roll Call

European Voice

Economist Diaries and Business Gifts



Economist.com
The Economist
Global Agenda
Contact us
Media Directory
Advertising info
Job opportunities





Printable page

E-mail this



The Iraq dossier row
Jan 29th 2004
From Economist.com


To rally support for war, the British prime minister’s office published a dossier of charges against Iraq in September 2002. It claimed, among other things, that the Baghdad regime could deploy weapons of mass destruction (WMD) within 45 minutes.

Yet with no WMD used by Iraqi forces in the ensuing war and none found, the dossier's veracity came under suspicion. One of its allegations, which George Bush had made part of his state-of-the-union address, was discredited by intelligence sources. Then, in June 2003, Andrew Gilligan, a BBC journalist, accused Alistair Campbell, Tony Blair’s chief spin-doctor, of having “sexed up” the dossier against the wishes of Britain’s security services (in particular, inserting the “45-minute” claim). A parliamentary investigation cleared Mr Campbell of this charge (Mr Campbell resigned in August 2003). But the BBC refused to back down, sparking a furious row with the government. In early July this took a tragic turn when a government scientist named David Kelly, who had been exposed as the main source of the BBC’s story, committed suicide. An inquiry into his death, which reported in January 2004, cleared the government of “sexing up” the dossier and largely—but not wholly—vindicated Mr Kelly's employers, the defence ministry. Criticism was instead heaped on the BBC, prompting the resignations of its director-general and chairman of governors.


more backgrounders...
Linked articles are premium content.



FROM THE WEB
Afghan Blast That Killed 7 G.I.'s Is Seen as Accidental
(New York Times) Fri 22:20 GMT

Kerry gets union endorsement
(CNN) Fri 18:29 GMT

French court convicts former Prime Minister Alain Juppe
(IHT) Fri 18:00 GMT

Israeli Military Destroys Suicide Bomber's Home in Bethlehem
(New York Times) Fri 17:11 GMT

McCain calls for probe into intel failures
(CNN) Fri 17:03 GMT

Kerry holds big leads in key primary states
(MSNBC) Fri 13:56 GMT


ADVERTISEMENT

OPINION | WORLD | BUSINESS | FINANCE & ECONOMICS | SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
PEOPLE | BOOKS & ARTS | MARKETS & DATA | DIVERSIONS | PRINT EDITION


Copyright © The Economist Newspaper Limited 2004. All rights reserved.
Legal disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Help



Mobile editions E-mail Subscribe Email and Mobile Editions Help